The Role of Owners in Engineering Construction Project Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpce.2023.03(12).08Keywords:
owner, Engineering construction, project managementAbstract
Owner project management plays an important role in managing construction projects. As an important part of construction project management, it is necessary to promptly contact relevant owners and make corresponding adjustments during construction. This is beneficial for the organization and task arrangement of the project, in order to assist in the scientific and effective management of the construction project. It not only ensures the quality of the project, but also reduces the cost of the facility construction process, and meets the requirements proposed by the owner. However, in the practical application process, the project management of the owner plays an important role in engineering project management, therefore, a relatively scientific management method must be adopted. Only in this way can the management of construction projects in engineering construction be further improved. This is mainly a comprehensive analysis and research on the engineering construction project management of the owner, hoping to provide helpful information for professionals in the same industry.
References
"[1] Yang Guohua. Discussion on the Management of Engineering Construction Projects by Owners [J]. Jushe, 2020 (02): 137-138
J. G. Ampiah, “An investigation of provision of quality basic education in Ghana: a case study of selected schools in the Central Region,” Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 19-37, 2008.
K. M. Lewin and J. S. Stuart, “Researching teacher education: new perspectives on practice, performance, and policy,” MUSTER Synthesis Report, DFID, London, UK, 2003.
L. Darling-Hammond, “Teacher quality and student achievement,” Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 8, p. 1, 2000.
M. Fullan, Change Forces, Falmer Press, London, UK, 1993.
L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransford, Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be able to Do, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005.
P. Dolton and O. D. Marcenaro-Gutierrez, “If you pay pea¬nuts do you get monkeys? A cross-country analysis of teacher pay and pupil performance,” Economic Policy, vol. 26, no. 65, pp. 5-55, 2011.
Eurydice, Quality Assurance in Teacher Education in Europe, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
A. Schleicher, Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from Around the World, OECD, Paris, France, 2012.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. 1974. Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation,
Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. 1998. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological review, 105 (1), 158.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 9(4), 450‐466.
Firth, J. R. 1968. Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. 2001. Some empirical evidence for the Involvement Load Hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539‐558.
Laufer, B. 2008. Form‐focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694‐716.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."
