Research on the Mechanism of Preventing and Resolving Ideological Risks in Universities under the Background of Sino Foreign Cooperation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpce.2023.03(08).06Keywords:
Ideology, Risk, Investigation and warning, mechanismAbstract
Universities bear the important responsibility and mission of educating people for the Party and the country, and are the forefront of ideological and political education and ideological work in universities. In the context of Sino foreign cooperative education, the ideological and political education and ideological work in universities are facing new challenges and risks. Therefore, universities with such backgrounds should effectively strengthen their awareness of preventing and resolving ideological risks, Strengthen the construction of risk prevention and resolution mechanisms in the ideological field to ensure campus harmony and stability.
References
Xu Shoufeng. Research on Preventing and Resolving Ideological Risks in Universities in the New Era [J]. Journal of Minnan Normal University, 2021 (1): 138-141
Zheng Jingbin, Sun Yawen. Ideological Risks and Control Paths in Universities in the New Era [J]. Journal of the East Youth Political College, 2019 (2): 62-67
Cheng Yin, Kong Jie, Huang Quanzhang Path Analysis of Innovative Development of Sino foreign Cooperative Education under the Background of ""Double First Class"" Construction [J]. Scientific Consulting, 2021 (27): 197-198
Yang Jian. Mainstream Ideological Network Risk Prevention Mechanism in Engineering Vocational Colleges [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Architecture Vocational and Technical College, 2019, (3): 93-96
Shi Min, Li Zhenjiang, Xu Lixun. Research on the Cultivation Path of Socialist Core Values for Chinese and Foreign Cooperative Education College Students [C]//Proceedings of the 5th Anniversary of the Establishment of the Cultural Research Institute and the Academic Seminar on Cultivating and Practicing Socialist Core Values. 2014
hi Jianzhong, Ma Dong: The Boundary between Platform Autonomy and Anti monopoly Regulation from a Dual Identityn [J]. Competition Policy Research, 2020,No.4,p.41-53.
Chen Tingqiang, Shen Jiaxian,et: The Bilateral Market Governance Path of Platform Economy Anti Monopoly: A Case Study Based on Alibaba Monopoly Event [J]. Management Review, 2022, No.3,p. 338-350.
Sun Jin: Anti Monopoly Regulation of Digital Platforms[J]. Chinese Social Sciences, 2021,No.5,p.101- 127.
Yang Dong: On the Reconstruction of Anti Monopoly Law: Addressing the Challenges of the Digital Economy [J]. Chinese Law, 2020,No.3,p.206-222.
Xu Bei: The Dilemma and Adjustment of Platform Anti monopoly Regulation in the Digital Economy Era [J]. Business Economics Research, 2022,No.1,p.93-96.
Tang Xia: Anti monopoly Review of the Concentration of Digital Platform Operators in China: Challenges and Responses [J]. Economic Law Analects, 2022,No.1,p.91-101.
Wang Xianlin: Exploration of Hot Issues in the Implementation of China's Anti Monopoly Law [M]. Legal Publishing House, China2011,p.336-337.
Wang Jian, Jiang Houchen: Concentration of Internet Platform Operators: Risks, Challenges, and Responses [J]. Journal of Jiangnan University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2021,No.5,p. 88-96.
Hu Shunling, ""Concentration of Internet Operators: Risks, Dilemmas, and Adjustments [J]. Knowledge and Action, 2022,No.4,p.63-69.
Feng Xinyu: Anti monopoly Regulations on Superplatform Killing Mergers and Acquisitions [J]. Southern Finance, 2022,No.9,p.90-100.
Fang Xiang: On the Innovative Value Objectives of Anti Monopoly Law in the Digital Economy Era [J]. Law, 2021,No.12,p.162-176.