Ecological Interpretation of Regional Elements in the Design of Local and Korean Urban Public Facilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpss.2023.03(12).01Keywords:
Regional Elements, South Korea, Urban Public FacilitiesAbstract
In the planning and construction of modern city, how to highlight the regional elements of the city and show the ecological design of the city has become the key content. Public facility design is an important part of urban construction. On the one hand, it is directly related to the public life, and on the other hand, it is closely related to the urban context and future development. Based on this, this paper mainly discusses the regional elements and ecological interpretation in the design of urban public facilities in our country and South Korea, aiming to provide reference for the subsequent design. To answer our research question, we begin by constructing a sample of all Chinese non- financial firms listed in the A-share market between 2007 and 2018 (n=29,181). We obtain financial statement data from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR) database. We obtain individual audit partner’s demographic information, such as gender and educational background, from the Chinese Research Data Services CARD database and the China Institute of Certified Public Accountants (CICPA) website. We lose 1,674 observations because we cannot find the signing auditor’s demographic information needed in the Heckman’s model and PSM; we further delete 4,783 observations because they do not have enough firm financial data to compute the variables used in our empirical tests; we exclude 672 observations because the annual reports are signed with three auditor signatures. Our final sample consists of 22,052 firm-year observations.
References
"[1]Zhang Shiyue. GAO Ling. Ecological Interpretation of Regional Elements in modern Urban Construction -- A Case study of Public Facilities Design in China and South Korea [J]. Theoretical Research on Urban Construction, 2015(22):5435-5436.
Zhang Shiyue. Performance of regional elements in Korean Public Design [J]. Decoration, 2015(6):2.
Sun L J. Regional cultural reconstruction of urban public facilities design [J]. Packaging Engineering, 2019, 40(2):4. (in our country with English abstract).
Krishnan, J., J. Krishnan, and H. Song. 2011. The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4), 1-27.
Knechel, W. R., Niemi, L., & Zerni, M. 2013. Empirical evidence on the implicit determinants of compensation in Big 4 audit partnerships. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(2), 349-387.
Kwon, S., and H. Yi. 2018. Do Social Ties between CEOs and Engagement Audit Partners Affect Audit Quality and Audit Fees? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), 139-161.
Lai, K., A. Sasmita, F. Gul, and Y. Foo. 2018. Busy Auditors, Ethical Behavior, and Discretionary Accruals Quality in Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1187-1198.
Lambert, T., K. Jones, J. Brazel, and D. Showalter. 2017. Audit Time Pressure and Earnings Quality: An Examination of Accelerated Filings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58, 50-66.
Larcker, D., and T. Rusticus. 2010. On the Use of Instrumental Variables in Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186-205.
Lennox, C., and B. Li. 2012. The Consequences of Protecting Audit Partners’ Personal Assets from the Threat of Liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(2-3), 154-173.
Lennox, C., X. Wu, and T. Zhang. 2014. Does Mandatory Rotation of Audit Partners Improve Audit Quality? The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1775-1803.
Long, Y., H. Zhao, X. Zhang, and Z. Li. 2017. Venture Capital under the Compression of Time and Space: High Speed Railway Opening to Regional Change of Venture Capital. Economic Research Journal, 04,195-208. (in Chinese).
López, D., and G. Peters. 2012. The Effect of Workload Compression on Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 139-165.
Malone, C., and R. Roberts. 1996. Factors Associated with the Incidence of Reduced Audit Quality Behaviors. Auditing, 15(2), 49.
McDaniel, L. 1990. The Effects of Time Pressure and Audit Program Structure on Audit Performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(2), 267-285.
McLeod, P. 1977. A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(4), 651-667.
Moray, N. 1959. Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56-60.
Myers, J., L. Myers, and T. Omer. 2003. Exploring the Term of the Auditor-client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation? The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779-799.
Nelson, M., J. Elliott, and R. Tarpley. 2002. Evidence from Auditors about Managers’ and Auditors’ Earnings Management Decisions. The Accounting Review, 77, 175-202.
Otley, D., and B. Pierce. 1996. Auditor Time Budget Pressure: Consequences and Antecedents. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 31-58.
Pashler, H., and Johnston, J. 1998. Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In: Pashler H, editor. Attention. Hove (United Kingdom): Psychology Press/Erlbaum. pp.
Prawitt, D., J. Smith, and D. Wood. 2009. Internal Audit Quality and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1255-1280.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2013. Observations Related to the Implementation of the Auditing Standard on Engagement Quality Review. Available at: https:// pcaobus.org/Inspections/Documents/120613_EQR.pdf.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2014. Initiative to Improve Audit Quality- Root Cause Analysis, Audit Quality Indicators, and Quality Control Standards. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/News/Events/Documents/0624252014_SAG_Meeting/06242014_AQI.pdf.
Reynolds, J., and Francis, J. 2000. Does Size Matter? The Influence of Large Clients on Office-level Auditor Reporting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375-400.
Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin. 1983. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55."
