Study on the Validity of Marital Fidelity Agreement

Authors

  • Xuan Dong Beijing Key Laboratory Of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Beijing University Of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpss.2023.03(10).06

Keywords:

Spousal fidelity agreement, Duty of fidelity, Atypical contract, Judicial application

Abstract

In recent years, with the continuous improvement of China's economic level and the increasing degree of social and cultural openness, the awareness of protection of personal rights and interests in marital relations has continued to rise, and the traditional view of marriage has been affected, and more and more couples choose to sign marital fidelity agreements in order to guard their marriage. However, the Civil Code and related interpretations are not clear how to adjust the spousal fidelity agreement, resulting in judicial practice on the validity of the spousal fidelity agreement "different judgment" phenomenon, the judicial credibility is affected. From the essence of marriage is a special "contract", the duty of fidelity between husband and wife both moral and legal nature. The spousal fidelity agreement both personal and property and different from the general civil contract, according to the type of responsibility agreed upon by the parties, the fidelity agreement should be divided into the fidelity agreement with the restriction of personal rights as the consideration, the fidelity agreement with the content of property division, mixed fidelity agreement, through the type of disposal to determine the effectiveness of the fidelity agreement, to protect the legitimate rights and interests of spouses, to play a disciplinary role for violations of the duty of fidelity and establish a healthy and civilized view of marriage and family.

References

García, J.I., Sepúlveda, S. and Noriega-Hoces, L. (2010) Beneficial Effect of Reduced Oxygen Concentration with Transfer of Blastocysts in IVF Patients Older than 40 Years Old. Health, 2, 1010-1017.

Mei Xiaying, Ye Xiongbiao: Research on the issue of marital fidelity agreement, Law Application (2020), No. 3, p. 102-112.

Shen Chen: The validity of intra-marital agreement under the view of Civil Code, Law Review, (2021), No. 6, p. 181-193.

Wang Xudong: ""Loyalty Agreement"" triggered by legal thinking, Journal of Nantong Normal College (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), (2004), No. 4, p. 29-32.

Wu Xiaofang: An analysis of the difficult problems of current marriage and family cases, People's Justice, (2010), No. 1, p. 54-58.

Chen Wei and Duan Yan: Review of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Marriage and Family Law Research Society of the Chinese Law Society, Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, (2013) No. 1, p. 24-28.

Jiang Yue: The legislative choice of personal relationship between husband and wife in contemporary civil code, Legal and Commercial Research, (2019), Vol. 36, No. 6, p. 28-38.

Sui Pensheng: Analysis of spousal fidelity agreements - with a focus on legal relationships, Journal of Law, (2011), Vol. 32, No. 2, p. 38-41.

He Xiaohang, He Zhi: Legal reflection on spousal fidelity agreement, Application of Law, (2012) Vol. 3, p. 54-58.

Jing Chunlan: Interpretation of the rules of adjudication of ""fidelity agreement"" between husband and wife, Politics and Law, (2017), No. 8, p. 153-160.

Guo Zhanhong: Jurisprudential reflection on the fidelity agreement of husband and wife, Journal of Ningbo University (Humanities), (2010), vol. 23, no. 2, p. 110-113.

Wang Goya, Loyalty agreement between husband and wife: value perception and validity judgment, Political Law Series, (2009), No. 5, p. 37-44.

Huang Lei, Yu Laide: On the duty of fidelity of husband and wife, Politics and Law, (2007), No. 6, p. 104-108.

Tong Hang: The validity of the spousal fidelity agreement, Journal of Gansu University of Political Science and Law, (2014) No. 6, p. 118-125.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Dong, X. (2023). Study on the Validity of Marital Fidelity Agreement. Journal of Theory and Practice of Social Science, 3(10), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpss.2023.03(10).06