Basic Work Analysis Of Mechanical And Electrical Manufacturing, Installation And Construction Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpes.2024.04(05).04Keywords:
Mechanical And Electrical Manufacturing Installation, Construction Technology, Basic Work, Analysis And ResearchAbstract
The reasonable implementation of mechanical and electrical manufacturing, installation and construction technology has an important impact on the orderliness and rationality of construction engineering construction. Due to the great complexity of mechanical and electrical manufacturing and installation, the installation and construction technology should be rationally selected in order to ensure the installation quality. In addition, construction cost, construction schedule, construction safety and construction quality should also be considered in the mechanical and electrical manufacturing and installation construction tasks, so as to improve the quality level of installation engineering. This article is mainly to analyze and study the basic work of mechanical and electrical manufacturing and installation construction technology.
References
Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2010). New literacies and autonomy in foreign language learning. In M. L. Luzon, M. J. Ruiz-Madrid, & M. N. Villanueva (Eds.), Digital genres, new literacies, and autonomy in language learning (pp. 63e80). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching autonomy. Oxfordshire, England: Routledge.
Black, R. (2006). Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction. E‐learning, 2(2), 170-184.
Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing Up: Digital: How the Web Changes Work, Education, and the Ways People Learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11-20.
Chusanachoti, R., & Juzwik, Mary M. (2009). EFL Learning through Language Activities outside the Classroom: A Case Study of English Education Students in Thailand, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Hyland, F. (2004). Learning Autonomously: Contextualising Out-of-class English Language Learning. Language Awareness, 13(3), 180-202.
Kuppens, A. H. (2010). Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(1), 65-85.
Lai, C. (2014). Perceiving and traversing in-class and out-of-class learning: accounts from foreign language learners in Hong Kong. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 265-284.
Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the Quality of Out-of-Class English Learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278-308.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford univ. press.
Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519–533.
Robinson, P. (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub.
Siemens, G. (2003). Learning ecology, communities and networks: Extending the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/learning_com munities.htm
Sundqvist, P. 2011. “A Possible Path to Progress: Out-of-school English Language Learners in Sweden.” In Beyond the Language Classroom, edited by P. Benson and H. Reinders, 106–118. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lin Jiang, Jiajun Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
