School of Economics and Management, Taishan University, Taian, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53469/jtpce.2023.03(09).04Keywords:
Deschool oriented society, schoolAbstract
In the 1970s, Illich published the book "Deschool Society", in which he criticized the deceptive nature of school education at that time and for the first time proposed the idea of abolishing schools in a more radical manner. However, even today, we can see that schools still exist, and with the further development of the knowledge economy, schools will continue to develop. Therefore, from a practical perspective, Illich's proposal to abolish schools is absurd. However, there is also rationality behind absurdity, which has enlightening significance for us to think about the respective positioning and roles of schools, education, and teachers today, how to view the many relationships between schools and education, diplomas and abilities, and people and technology. Therefore, this article takes Illich's idea of de institutionalization as a clue to explore the rationality behind his absurdity, in order to provide some reflections for today's education.
References
Zhu Xun. Criticism and Resolution of the Negative Function of Modern Schools -- Based on the Interpretation of Illich's ""Non school Society"" [J]. Education Academic Monthly, 2013 (04): 100-105
Wang Jin, Du Wenge Interpretation of the Essence of ""Non Schooling Society"" and Its Enlightenment on School Education in China [J]. New Education, 2011 (08): 62-63
[US] Ivan Ilić, translated by Wu Kangning. Non school Society [M]. China Light Industry Press, 2017
Li Lili. A Society for Eliminating School Myth - A Review of Illich's ""Deschool ization"" Educational Thought [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2008 (02): 145-150
[US] Ivan Ilić, translated by Wu Kangning. Non school Society [M]. China Light Industry Press, 2017
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016b). Fostering strategic learning: The development and validation of the Writing Strategies for Motivational Regulation Questionnaire (WSMRQ). Asia-Pacific Educational Research, 25(1),123-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015- 0243-4.
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 213-240. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4.
[22] Üstünlüoğlu, E. (2009). Autonomy in language learning: Do students take responsibility for their learning? Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5(2), 148-169.
Wang, Z. Y. (2021). A Study on the Motivational Regulation Strategies of Higher Vocational Students in English Mobile Learning [Unpublished master’s thesis, Xi’an Foreign Language University].
Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80004-1.
Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B. (2013). Assessing and predicting college students use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.699901.
Yan, C., Gao, Y., & He, C. (2020). Examining Chinese EFL postgraduates' motivational regulation strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 15, 250-278.
Yang, N.-D. (1998). Exploring a new role for teachers: Promoting learner autonomy. The system, 26, 127-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00069-9.
Yıldırım, Ö. (2008). Turkish EFL learners’ readiness for learner autonomy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 65-80.
Zheng, C. P., Liang, J.-C., Li, M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). The relationship between English language learners’ motivation and online self-regulation: A structural equation modeling approach. The system, 76, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.05.003.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis (2nd Edition). Routledge.